• Welcome to iMtG Server: Gathering.
 

Knights of the Reliquary

Started by oXiDe4SNPR, April 09, 2016, 07:35:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

oXiDe4SNPR


Knights of the Reliquary

60 cards, 0 sideboard


3 {Plains}
3 {Plains}
3 {Plains}
3 {Plains}
2 {Forest}
2 {Forest}
1 {Forest}
1 {Forest}
1 {Sejiri Steppe}
1 {Treetop Village}
2 {Grasslands}
2 {Selesnya Sanctuary}

24 lands


1 {Knight of the Reliquary}
1 {Sigarda, Host of Herons}
1 {Knotvine Paladin}
1 {Knight of the White Orchid}
4 {Knight Exemplar}
1 {Kinsbaile Cavalier}
4 {White Knight}
4 {Accorder Paladin}
1 {Paladin of Prahv}
1 {Zhalfirin Commander}
1 {Kabira Vindicator}
1 {Alaborn Cavalier}
1 {Juniper Order Ranger}
1 {Wilt-Leaf Cavaliers}
1 {Steward of Valeron}

24 creatures


1 {Coat of Arms}
2 {Whispersilk Cloak}
2 {Swiftfoot Boots}
1 {Reciprocate}
1 {Griffin Guide}
1 {Test of Faith}
1 {Reprisal}
1 {Edge of Autumn}
1 {Sigil Blessing}
1 {Heroes' Reunion}

12 other spells


Sideboard

Kaylesh

Quote from: Taysby on April 09, 2016, 12:50:05 PM
These should be casual
Indeed I don't think Knights tribal will be doing great in legacy tournaments.
Is this meant to play in legacy tourney's or just kitchen table?

oXiDe4SNPR

Why casual? Is accepted in legacy tournaments?
This deck is only for plays with friends, no comp... Or for play in some mothers bed...

Kaylesh

Quote from: oXiDe4SNPR on April 10, 2016, 04:32:57 AM
Why casual? Is accepted in legacy tournaments?
This deck is only for plays with friends, no comp... Or for play in some mothers bed...
Well, yes. It is legal to play in the legacy format. However, the legacy section of the forum is more for the tournament decks, where the casual section houses the "play with friends" decks.

Mr_Fahrenheit

The point being that while it is perfectly fine to post your deck here, if you are looking for any assistance or tips or anything suited to casual play, you are more likely to find what you are looking for in the casual section. Most people who frequent this section focus on competitive play and as such will give you advice that you won't be interested in unless you plan to play this deck competitively.

There is nothing to actually tell you (or any new user for that matter) this information though, until you post here and get told to go away. So don't take it personally,  this has been going on forever and it is unlikely to change.

oXiDe4SNPR

I'm really sorry, i thought i would share my decks whith other users, i thought it consisted of that and i wanted to contribute my bit ... I did no thing these were so serious post... I'm sorry. I'm new to this app (very clear) and not understand much english ( i'm sorry for it, and i hope that you made understand more or less what i say... Thx google trad.) i did not think that these forums were for help to mount a competitive decks... I'm sorry guys...!!!

Splicer

Quote from: oXiDe4SNPR on April 11, 2016, 04:14:08 PM
I'm really sorry, i thought i would share my decks whith other users, i thought it consisted of that and i wanted to contribute my bit ... I did no thing these were so serious post... I'm sorry. I'm new to this app (very clear) and not understand much english ( i'm sorry for it, and i hope that you made understand more or less what i say... Thx google trad.) i did not think that these forums were for help to mount a competitive decks... I'm sorry guys...!!!
There's nothing wrong with sharing your decks here. Even so, most people would prefer you to put them in the casual section if you aren't looking for competitive advice.

Dstyle1

My first deck was legacy gw Knights:).

Tips for your deck:
I would us 4 aether vial.
Then a land package that lets u take advantage of the knight of the reliquary.
Land updates you should look into are

The gw fetches in both enemy an team colors.
  I used arid Mesas and a 2 g/w one since all your knights are white be teally only kotr is green I felt u could get sneaky.

Some gw duals either shock or dual doesn't matter. I only ran 1savannah and 2 shocks.

I also used qasali pridemages as. Splash for green

U also want 4 sword to plowshares as the top removal in the format.

Thirsty prof deck won't usually win you a tourney but it is fun and some Knights will be 2-2, some1-2, and a few 3-1s. 

Gal I'll look at your creature base for more tips.

Dstyle1

About creatures :

1 drops I used was {student of warfare}
2 drops was {knight if white orchid}
                      {silver Knights} (anti burn, goblin)
3 drops { knight exemplar} big boss u Got them great!!
I usually wanted a flying knight and they usually fit In the 3 drop slot
  Also KOTR {knight of the reliquary}
4 drop was {kinsbale cavalier}

Non knight cards I used that you may want to look into
-{stoneforge mystic} plus a couple swords
-{qasali pridemages}
{elspeth knight errant}

I wills try to get play sets of each card to help get the card you want when u need it.

oXiDe4SNPR

Quote from: Dstyle1 on April 15, 2016, 11:08:29 PM
About creatures :

1 drops I used was {student of warfare}
2 drops was {knight if white orchid}
                      {silver Knights} (anti burn, goblin)
3 drops { knight exemplar} big boss u Got them great!!
I usually wanted a flying knight and they usually fit In the 3 drop slot
  Also KOTR {knight of the reliquary}
4 drop was {kinsbale cavalier}

Non knight cards I used that you may want to look into
-{stoneforge mystic} plus a couple swords
-{qasali pridemages}
{elspeth knight errant}

I will try to get play sets of each card to help get the card you want when u need it.
Nice!!! Thx!!!
It looks perfect!!! I will try to tweak a some knights and put some play set as u said, it see if i find some cheap stoneforge and see of i can find my elspeth foil, wich now seems to have disappeared me!!!
The rest will be matter of selecting good knights ride, i'll have more facilities being g/w, just this modified this deck, wich is almost as it came in knights vs dragons promo deck.
Thx u for the recomendations.
I'll be aware!!!
(Sorry 4 my english)

Dstyle1

Play sets are usually better than singles because you want to have s good idea about what is next in your deck.

Granted with singles every draw phase is a surprise!

Dstyle1

I think your arguing for the sake of arguing. you have a dozen other topics to troll around in go there.

Dstyle1

But we're in a legacy tribal deck. Alternate win cons should be in the for that fits the tribal theme. Some time your win is just out aground your opponent.

I understand that you can squeeze other cards in to "fool" the opponent. I had a friend AnT then after side boards goes team America.

The op had a tribal theme idea and if there is an alt win can it should go with the tribe

I.e.: legacy goblins

Mr_Fahrenheit

Just because you are playing a tribal deck does not mean that you only include cards relating to that tribe. If your goal is to get the best performance out of your deck you include cards that further your game plan whether they are part of your tribe or not. For example, I play elves in legacy. Am I supposed to not include {craterhoof behemoth} because it isn't an elf? That is just ludicrous.

Dstyle1

Quote from: Mr_Fahrenheit on April 18, 2016, 08:19:56 PM
Just because you are playing a tribal deck does not mean that you only include cards relating to that tribe. If your goal is to get the best performance out of your deck you include cards that further your game plan whether they are part of your tribe or not. For example, I play elves in legacy. Am I supposed to not include {craterhoof behemoth} because it isn't an elf? That is just ludicrous.

So now that we have sidetracked from the point of helping a player with their legacy knight deck, we have started a discussion on the semantics of deck-building in the legacy format. IF your playing elves should you be playing {Liliana of the Veil} as an alternate win con? ....wait maybe you should, or play {force of will} , wait you should play {Jace the Mindsculptor} as alternate win cons.  Do they all fit probably not,  The point being that I was here trying to help another Knights player with things that helped me be competitive at legacy tournaments. If we want to discuss semantics we should start another Topic. ( I will see you there)