Green And White

[Darkseeker]

Green And White 66 cards, 0 sideboard 1 {Temple Garden} 1 {Forest} 1 {New Benalia} 1 {Selesnya Guildgate} 1 {Forest} 1 {Plains} 1 {Plains} 1 {Plains} 1 {Forest} 1 {Forest} 1 {Forest} 1 {Plains} 1 {Forest} 1 {Selesnya Guildgate} 1 {Forest} 1 {Plains} 1 {Plains} 1 {Plains} 1 {Plains} 1 {Forest} 1 {Forest} 21 lands 1 {Rubbleback Rhino} 1 {Lambholt Elder} 1 {Gatecreeper Vine} 1 {Somberwald Dryad} 1 {Festerhide Boar} 1 {Kavu Predator} 1 {Dawnstrike Paladin} 1 {Krosan Tusker} 1 {Siege Wurm} 1 {Freewind Equenaut} 1 {Crowned Ceratok} 1 {Cavalry Pegasus} 1 {Hollowhenge Beast} 1 {Axebane Stag} 1 {Troll Ascetic} 1 {Boneyard Wurm} 1 {Ghor-Clan Savage} 1 {Archetype of Endurance} 1 {Silent Sentinel} 1 {Silvercoat Lion} 1 {Sunspire Griffin} 1 {Vitu-Ghazi Guildmage} 1 {Wall of Essence} 1 {Thraben Sentry} 1 {Voice of Resurgence} 1 {Thraben Valiant} 1 {Polukranos, World Eater} 1 {Basilica Guards} 1 {Sun Titan} 1 {Centaur's Herald} 1 {Auramancer} 1 {Yoked Ox} 32 creatures 1 {Angelic Edict} 1 {Daily Regimen} 1 {Ordeal of Nylea} 1 {Call of the Conclave} 1 {Angelic Edict} 1 {Pacifism} 1 {Titanic Growth} 1 {Winds of Rath} 1 {Pay No Heed} 1 {Righteousness} 1 {Ray of Revelation} 1 {Miraculous Recovery} 1 {Bramblecrush} 13 other spells Sideboard

[Munchlax]

Is this deck intentionally singleton?

[Swamplord99]

Is this deck intentionally singleton?

Yeah, why is it 66 cards and really weird land layout?