What's been up with Piotr?

Brawler_1337 · April 07, 2016, 05:31:55 PM

Piotr's been flooding the Magic Discussion board with repostings of user reviews. Why? They're not relevant to the game, and they don't add much discussion at all. I'm confused.

LinkCelestrial · April 07, 2016, 05:37:45 PM

Well, when Piotr reads this I'll probably get yelled at but.

Piotr is inflating his ego. I'm assuming it ends up in Discussion (for MtG so, the wrong area) because that's the highest traffic area on the forums (that I'm aware of).

Piotr · April 23, 2016, 04:54:26 AM

Quote from: Noblellama on April 08, 2016, 07:28:36 AM
(...) any one new sees these and just thinks the owner is bashing on anyone who leaves a negative review (...)

iMtG is not for idiots who compute as you just described. It is not for them.

It helps me if idiots avoid the app so that I do not waste my time supporting them. Better to focus on smart people, don't you think?

Piotr · April 23, 2016, 04:59:22 AM

Quote from: LinkCelestrial on April 07, 2016, 05:37:45 PM
Piotr is inflating his ego.

No, I learned from {Donald Trump} and I discarded my ego. I have none left, it was just a nuisance.

InfinitiveDivinity · April 23, 2016, 05:06:42 PM

Quote from: Piotr on April 23, 2016, 04:59:22 AM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on April 07, 2016, 05:37:45 PM
Piotr is inflating his ego.

No, I learned from {Donald Trump} and I discarded my ego. I have none left, it was just a nuisance.

Trump links to Mind Sculptor 😂

LinkCelestrial · April 23, 2016, 06:09:45 PM

Quote from: Piotr on April 23, 2016, 04:59:22 AM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on April 07, 2016, 05:37:45 PM
Piotr is inflating his ego.

No, I learned from {Donald Trump} and I discarded my ego. I have none left, it was just a nuisance.

I find that very hard to believe.

Spencer Addington · April 24, 2016, 12:26:55 AM

Quote from: LinkCelestrial on April 23, 2016, 06:09:45 PM
Quote from: Piotr on April 23, 2016, 04:59:22 AM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on April 07, 2016, 05:37:45 PM
Piotr is inflating his ego.

No, I learned from {Donald Trump} and I discarded my ego. I have none left, it was just a nuisance.

I find that very hard to believe.

Find what hard to believe? The some one could learn from Donald trump? That trump discarded his ego? That an ego is a nuisance? Or that Piotr doesn't have an ego?

LinkCelestrial · April 24, 2016, 03:52:16 PM

Quote from: Spencer Addington on April 24, 2016, 12:26:55 AM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on April 23, 2016, 06:09:45 PM
Quote from: Piotr on April 23, 2016, 04:59:22 AM
Quote from: LinkCelestrial on April 07, 2016, 05:37:45 PM
Piotr is inflating his ego.

No, I learned from {Donald Trump} and I discarded my ego. I have none left, it was just a nuisance.

I find that very hard to believe.
Find what hard to believe? The some one could learn from Donald trump? That trump discarded his ego? That an ego is a nuisance? Or that Piotr doesn't have an ego?

3 and 5.

Piotr · April 26, 2016, 06:35:06 AM

Ego is the ability to give a .love. what stupid people think. I lost it, so did {Donald Trump}. I find it easy to believe.

Rass · April 26, 2016, 08:34:58 AM

Quote from: Piotr on April 26, 2016, 06:35:06 AM
Ego is the ability to give a .love. what stupid people think. I lost it, so did {Donald Trump}. I find it easy to believe.

Where is this definition from? Because most people use Webster for that and it's nothing like that

Piotr · April 26, 2016, 11:05:11 AM

Webster definition is confusing, is it not?* The point is, if Trump had no ego, he would behave exactly as he does. Richard Feynman also had no ego. Check his book: What Do You Care What Other People Think?

* I mean, my definition works well for me, how about you ;]

Spencer Addington · April 26, 2016, 12:25:42 PM

I didn't know we were allowed to make up new definitions for words..

Piotr · April 26, 2016, 12:49:51 PM

Quote from: Spencer Addington on April 26, 2016, 12:25:42 PM
I didn't know we were allowed to make up new definitions for words..

Lol yes you are

Language is a living thing, my definition fits how the people use and understand the word. It works with the Webster definition too, in a funny kind of way. Only stupid people have ego, you see ;]

Rass · April 26, 2016, 01:09:57 PM

This definition http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ego and what words you use to define it are different. Yes words change and evolve. Just because you and your group of friends define it that way does not make its meaning change to the rest of the world. Being a society ( if you are being part of it) you agree to certain things being true. Example using Webster as a use for defining words. Yes there can be a language difference but that still does not make it correct.

Rass · April 26, 2016, 01:15:26 PM

Quote from: Piotr on April 26, 2016, 11:05:11 AM
Webster definition is confusing, is it not?* The point is, if Trump had no ego, he would behave exactly as he does. Richard Feynman also had no ego. Check his book: What Do You Care What Other People Think?

* I mean, my definition works well for me, how about you ;]

No the definition works fine for me I do not find it confusing. English is my first language so it may be unfair me to expect you who speaks several other languages to understand English as well.

No I didn't read his book but that is a whole other discussion that I do not wish to delve into at this time possibly ever.

I just don't see how you can say you or Donald trump do not have an ego under the Webster defines it.